Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Amir Weintraub Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Weintraub analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Amir Weintraub Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 2 - 0 Weintraub
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 51.6% of points on his second serve, while Weintraub has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 49.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Weintraub has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Weintraub has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 35% of matches played (W/L 14/ 26), with Weintraub winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 47/ 54). Weintraub has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 372/ 224), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 19% (W/L 3/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13), where as Weintraub has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Evans winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Evans winning 4 and Weintraub winning 2. The last match between Evans and Weintraub was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 14-01-2016, Q2 round, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Weintraub have played a deciding set 2 times, with Evans winning 2 times and Weintraub 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 0, and Weintraub 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.4 while Weintraub has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Weintraub has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 28.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Weintraub has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
60
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
161
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
60% (552-373)
Career Total W/L
59% (412-288)
28% (5-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$136,853
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Evans | Amir Weintraub |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 34 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:19 | 1:44:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (111/176) | 59% (106/181) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (83/111) | 57% (60/106) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (35/65) | 55% (41/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (10/18) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (80/181) | 33% (58/176) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Amir Weintraub
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
113)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
4
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
54 of
113)
121
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Amir Weintraub
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Amir Weintraub |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 28% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (17/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (207/241) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 191.22 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (811/1435) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (573/811) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (322/624) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (34/120) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (509/1459) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (5/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 10% (1/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Daniel Evans
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Amir Weintraub Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Amir Weintraub
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Amir Weintraub
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Amir Weintraub
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Amir Weintraub
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Amir Weintraub
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Dodig
Player
Amir Weintraub
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blaz Kavcic
Player
Amir Weintraub
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amir Weintraub
Player
Yuuya Kibi
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Amir Weintraub
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
79 of
107)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Amir Weintraub
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Weintraub Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Evans
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
